Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] introduce isar-image class

[chombourger@gmail.com]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1000 bytes --]



On Wednesday, October 31, 2018 at 7:39:14 AM UTC+1, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>
> Before we move things in meta-isar around: I'd like to first of all get 
> rid of 
> the dependency on meta-isar for building typical images. Everything that 
> is not 
> of demonstration purpose (specific boards, example recipes etc.) should go 
> to 
> the core layer (meta). Therefore, we should not introduce further generic 
> classes to meta-isar. 
>

Hi Jan,

That's great to know, I was wondering if we had some guidelines on what 
should go to meta vs meta-isar
We will probably need to document this somewhere and introduce some 
mechanisms to have our CI jobs check if isar/meta is buildable without 
isar/meta-isar

In the short term, I can amend the patch series to move the class to 
isar/meta
I believe we could also place isar-image-base there but leave 
isar-image-debug in isar/meta-isar since the definition of a debug image we 
have there appears to be just an example
What do you think?

Thanks
Cedric 

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1295 bytes --]