On Wednesday, October 31, 2018 at 7:39:14 AM UTC+1, Jan Kiszka wrote:

Before we move things in meta-isar around: I'd like to first of all get rid of
the dependency on meta-isar for building typical images. Everything that is not
of demonstration purpose (specific boards, example recipes etc.) should go to
the core layer (meta). Therefore, we should not introduce further generic
classes to meta-isar.

Hi Jan,

That's great to know, I was wondering if we had some guidelines on what should go to meta vs meta-isar

We will probably need to document this somewhere and introduce some mechanisms to have our CI jobs check if isar/meta is buildable without isar/meta-isar

In the short term, I can amend the patch series to move the class to isar/meta

I believe we could also place isar-image-base there but leave isar-image-debug in isar/meta-isar since the definition of a debug image we have there appears to be just an example

What do you think?

Thanks

Cedric